lasaslol.blogg.se

1. #8gb vs 16gb ram final cut mac os
2. #8gb vs 16gb ram final cut windows 10
3. #8gb vs 16gb ram final cut pro
4. #8gb vs 16gb ram final cut software

Lots of workloads work fine in 8G of RAM. Summary: I see no reason that that the m1 is special with respect to memory requirements. Performance analysis has only gotten much more complicated since then. 4380010203 (in 1971): Donald Knuth, a god of computer programming and performance, found his intuition was unreliable. This was really brought home to me reading. Unfortunately the only way to know about performance is to measure it systematcally. The effect of having less RAM than the working set is a very high performance hit and this effect is highly non-linear. The working set is the amount of RAM needed by the program so that it isn't slowed down a lot by paging. What are your piggiest workloads? How much RAM is needed for their working set? All modern OSes can "page", keeping only the highly accessed memory in RAM. All this depends on my workloads and surely differ from yours. 16G isn't enough to completely eliminate the browser tab problem. 4G systems are fine until I get too many browser tabs (much smaller than I'm accustomed to, but I use a lot of tabs). I can use 2G systems, but I think that I can feel the pinch (they are special cases so I might have that wrong). I prefer large memories but haven't bothered to measure performance effects. I have lots of systems, all running Linux.

This is probably useless advice because you don't know how much RAM your workload uses until it is too much. That's probably born of a combination of memory being cheap and experience with annoying limitations.īecause the m1 RAM is extortionately expensive, it may well be reasonable to buy an 8G system. even if the SSD is fast, it takes orders of magnitude more time to access something on SSD than in RAMĪs to comment: he's a bit extreme.The data representation is identical (so data takes the same space).The code density of ARM 64-bit code is close to that for x86-64 code (x86-64 is slightly better).The OS is the same (perhaps with fewer drivers, but that doesn't add up to much).There is *nothing* special about the m1 that reduces memory requirements compared with an Intel Mac. And statements get made that don't make any sense.

#8gb vs 16gb ram final cut software

The graphics card is does not play that much of an important role for most video editing software except for DaVinci Resolve which is GPU hungry.Īnyway thank you for your continued contributions and for keeping your cool when dealing with salty people. Most of these software are CPU intensive and need RAM to buffer.

#8gb vs 16gb ram final cut mac os

The R11 with RTX3090 and 64GB ram absolutely devours movies but I prefer Mac OS with final cut for my work.

#8gb vs 16gb ram final cut pro

So I returned it and decided to get the M1 16" pro 16GB when it comes out, because everyone is saying the 16GB resolved the issue for them in the 13" MacBook pro M1. For myself with the MacBook pro 13" with M1 chip struggled to render videos in final cut 4k at 60fps. He did not say it's a windows PC, so your comment is a miss, and your snarky attitude is unwelcome.įrom personal experience (20 days) the M1 with 8gb RAM is enough for the average user. He's been nothing but polite and just engaging in discussion on the benefits of more RAM. Wow take it easy bud, sounds like you have unresolved insecurities because there is absolutely no need to attack 's credibility.

#8gb vs 16gb ram final cut windows 10

I know you like to be the "resident RFD expert" when it comes to literally any PC/computer thread, but none of this information is correct when it comes to Macs with the M1 processor.Ĭomparing an 8 GB RAM M1 Mac Mini to a Windows 10 PC with any processor and 8 GB RAM is not directly comparable.